🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an event that started out as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate gatherings where Black people are remunerated to address white audiences about hidden biases and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The tide has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the UK, Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the month is commemorated is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a valuable example in how co-option leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we witnessed the largest far-right rally in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels empowered to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are growing in the European continent as a whole.

In the America, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A drive to remove Black history and narrative from the archives is in progress. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the celebration represents how minimally it can be influential if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the realities of the current era. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is needed. Denise Miller, a educator at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just do away with observances such as Black History Month altogether, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an period that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an framework that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a era that does not avoid governmental matters, and provides room for people, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of far-right rallies in the street? Organizations who celebrate it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and alertness to subtle slights, but challenged by the dangers that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and adaptive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.